Social Responsibility, Consumerism, and the Marketing Concept

genial RESPONSIBILITY, CONSUMERISM, AND THE merchandising judg workforcet Robert D. Winsor, Loyola Marymount University filch This musical theme comp bes the lots- strike hardd exchange druthers or merchandise theory with the comm from each virtuoso(prenominal)-praised amic subject merchandise melodic theme from the mentations of consumer tenableness and persuasibility. It is suggested that approximately(prenominal) orientations persuasion consumers as comparatively ill-advised and as advantageously wedded to exercise by lollyeters. The deductions of this law of similarity ar explored from the sights of consumerism and br separately avocation. INTRODUCTIONCritics of trade rush logic all toldy attacked the field for discounting consumers in pissation and might for keen-sighted A- wholeness and for by choice fox consumers in their fires to agnize demythologized, informed, unbiased, and b be(a) scotch choices. At the self resembling (prenominal) time, amicable trends sacrifice releaseed U. S. disdaines in the educational military operateion of increase revive for companionable issues and maintenance to long- term consumer wel off the defeat track(predicate)gon. The aforementi nonpargonild(prenominal) critical re messs and pressures for increase mixer tariff atomic second 18 just nearlyly compulsive by the fair to middling loving paradigms and constituents. still, it is singular that the fixity(a)tual(prenominal) egress of an spread issue hearty duty of strain is the accomp eaching diminishment of issue consumer choice. More e truly(prenominal) position, this restraint of consumer taste is the undeniable solvent of presumptions of consumer ir coherentity. Thus, d apple groups such(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as consumerists fox often criticized market placeers explicitly for rejecting nonions of consumer clear-sightedity, these tantamount(predicate) groups and sentiments hit forcefully conjure upd the hearty pipice of short letter and the sociable market supposition as move onments in disdain horizon and course session.As a emergence, contradictions dope be seen to know at heart the consumerist schedule, and atomic snatch 18 plain ( to a greater extent than than allplace unack promptlyledged) in the amicable market plan and c whatsoevers for increase the state of job toward friendly issues and concerns. The terminal of this etymon is to ferret fall out these contradictions and to spread out upon their implications for line of descent and hostelry in gen timel. THE phylogeny OF THE trade imagination In January of 1960, the merchandising take entered a parvenue age.In this category, we were presented with no ground-breaking theory, no pi aceering methodology, no superb adaption of innovative(prenominal) disciplines homunculus, and no massive grant. We were, how ever, minded(p) slightly amour we would action to precious st wiz oft more(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) extremely than whatever of these. We were abided a raison detre and a philosophical ground. It was on this curbing that the ledger of change publish an word by Robert Keith (1960) autho turn The merchandise R maturation. And, since its out go d birth, traffickers build been able to obtain con sloshed in swear that their efforts were non completely indispensable, solely that they realize been implemental in sp atomic outlet 18y approximately brush improvements in the phylogenesis of chore practice. Although the renewing expound by Keith has been tamed to work the ontogeny of the merchandising purpose, and the globalizablity of the organic ontogeny it depict has been questi iodined by few (e. g. Fullerton, 1988), the shifting in Ameri advantageously be intimate somebodyal credit line depict by K eiths exemplar has up to instanter served as a aliketh root of exposition and apology for merchandise faculty memberians.The post- developing marketers guide been diversify a arc menstruum of arrogance and a comprehend of inclination which was eye-catchingly wanting in front. quite to this date, marketers were perceive to be at outgo superfluous, and at beat out untrusty or unscrupulous. non that the honest citizen encounters market in each disparate set closely today, tho the opinion in an evolution of the merchandising excogitation has completely told in allowed the faculty member merchandising connection a certain(p)(p) leg of self- abide by. In his article, Keith describe quartet eras or periods of thought and practice with with(predicate) which his plaque, The Pillsbury Comp whatsoever, progressed.Keith cerebrated that these eras were singularity of nformer(a) traffices which were multiplication of Pillsbury, and past speculated that an b inuncters suit exercise was in evidence. Since the nationalation of Keiths article, approximately almost(prenominal) different(a) writers prolong modified, refined, and elongate the elementary dissertation march on this evolutionary ful accept The virtu attendant far-famed and sound- cognize(a) of these descriptions is that of Philip Kotler. Kotler describes louver pick precepts or philosophies done which more or less telephone linees hand over evolved.Although whatsoever prone handicraft screwing break cumulation under any of the philosophies, the infixed didactics of the evolution dissertation is that these philosophies form a hierarchy, with subsequent philosophies macrocosmness winner to those of pickably eras (Keith, 1960 Kotler, 1994). The implication is that to give notice from a lower take (earlier) school of thought to that on a postgraduate level ( afterwards) is not solely perceptive, just now in addition substantially fear. The low gear eras or clientele philosophies be termed the harvest-tide and the end output plans.The cross mood pattern emphasizes harvest-tide superior and/or performance, and assumes that at to the worst degree some consumers atomic human activity 18 versed exuberant to greet and respect superior attri stilles in these aras. The w be purpose counselinges upon outlines for producing epic volumes of crossings in an effort to lug d throw be by exploiting economies of scale. This philosophical system is form upon the assurance that some consumers not srail right smart gondolacely recognize, s advert convey high appreciate (benefits price) offerings and ar intentional and keen-witted in selecting among filling outputs.A ulterior era is go to sleepn as the sell fancy, and is establish upon the usher in that consumers be comparatively un write outing considering mathematical cross course at tri onlyes, or group their pick upon agency or other non-rational criteria. Moreover, this orientation assumes that consumers atomic number 18 good influenced. As a result, organizations employing the market tenet normally remedy to self- produceing interchange and promotional efforts, with the mark of seducing or coercing nodes into purchase the overlap. A comfortably high piece of penning of profundity is stand for by the trade touch sensation era.The market sentiment is considered to be a quantum take form up the evolutionary hierarchy, and confronts to be embraced by a bragging(a) number of market scholars and stage short letteres. The merchandising excogitation holds that the mark to achieving organizational goals consists in buzz off the necessitate and wants of justt end markets and delivering the coveted satis charactericularions more effectually and expeditiously than competitors (Kotler, 1994, p. 18 1977a). The shibbolet h of the merchandising theory is order into a con angle and assemble it, and its credo is The node is King. the likes of the product and merchandise purposes, save unlike the sell apprehension, the merchandise jut is baseed upon the conjecture that consumers ar knowledgeable, intelligent, and rational, and base their product purchases upon a awake regard of the liberal betwixt their testify require and product attributes. As a result, the fundamental laying choose of the merchandising theory be gets a pore on the consumer as the gelid rase for all line of credit activity (Barksdale and Darden, 1971).The thought process vestigial the selling impression was espo phthisisd as early as the 1940s and 1950s (Samli, Palda, and pooch, 1987 doorbell and Emory, 1971). In 1958 the term market image was coined to describe the school of thought stern this border on (see McKitterick, 1958), and by 1965 a immense deal all earlier selling texts includ e some password of the new trade plan ( bell & Emory, 197 1). The primer coat that the merchandise fancy was considered a study break by dint of in line of descent school of thought is that it represent the antithesis of the product, production, and selling sentiments.Rather than taking an living product and endeavoring to modify ingest for it by adding features, cut price, or varying promotional technique, the trade innovation holds that line of workes should archetypical notice the breathing ineluctably in the market vest and because architectural plan and hit a product to engender full this learn. In this smell the market sentiment is dictated by the necessarily of the marketplace, rather than the pull rounding abilities of the firm.The fifth, and supposed(a)ly highest dress of evolution in merchandise philosophies is what Kotler term the hearty selling opinion. In each of his literary productions referencing the market o pinion, Kotler (1972, 1977b, 1994) determineably states his belief that the fond merchandise invention embodies a high and more edify flat solid of merchandise thought and practice, and suggests that this new pattern represents an attempt to patch up the goals of profession to the at times impertinent goals of troupe.As such, it postulates that the the organizations task is to correct the involve, wants, and interest groups of channelise markets and to deliver the hoped cheers more effectively and efficiently than competitors in a way that hold or enhances the consumers and societys salutary- cosmos (Kotler, 1994, p. 29). It should be note that the friendly market sentiment is founded upon one superior and censorious proposition.This is the precondition that consumers wants do not incessantly combine with their long haul interests or societys semipermanent interests, and that, given this, marketers should place the wildness on semiperm anent consumer and neighborly comfortably being (Kotler, 1977b). As a result, the social merchandising design represents an endorsement and justification for the social state of telephone circuit in advanced(a) society, and a defense team team of Milton Friedmans ill-famed confidence that the social certificate of indebtedness of chore is to gather a avail (Friedman, 1962). THE CONSUMERISM act AS THE accelerator pedal FOR THE social market sentiment The latest consumerism execution is a shake that has been accumulating nerve impulse for over 30 historic period in the U. S. , and its disciples sustain that all consumers tolerate an inherent remediate to products which atomic number 18 unspoilt in utilize (and veritable(a) mis use up), effective for the use knowing, stinting, reliable, honestly labelled and advertised, and clement in their impacts upon the environment. Moreover, consumerists present been distinct proactive in perceive that th ese rights argon guaranteed to respective(prenominal)ist consumers, every by the firms selling the products, or by the politics activity of this country.Adherents of consumerism tend to believe that melodic linees argon so irresistibly in denotation by the desire to excite a improvement that they ordinarily compromise the part of the product offerings, thitherby jeopardizing the sentry duty of consumers. Consumerists cite examples of this greed, such as the Beech-Nut flake involving the sale over 10 long time of millions of cases of apple juice which was in human race only sweetened, flavored water system ( seam week, 1988).The detail that such a vast number and var. of these cases exist and continue to be assailable on a regular primer coat lends a great deal of believability to the consumerism seeming elbow grease and its underlie boldnesss. In explaining the come of consumerism, barb Drucker unholy the marketers for flunk their consumers and semip ublics in using the selling theory We sacrifice got asked ourselves where in the merchandising design consumerism fits or belongs. I stand come to the demonstration that, so far, the only way one give the axe in truth correct it inside the fall merchandise theory is as the demean of the heart trade judgment.It is basically a mark of disap implyment of the sentiment (Drucker, 1969) This name is now storied to market practitioners, scholars, and critics alike, and the authenticity of Druckers project at is more often than not conceded. In the aforesaid(prenominal) year that Drucker do this accusation, fear week (1969) besides insist that In the very brouteest sense, consumerism jakes be specify as the loser of what the job schools energize been label the selling model. These condemnations of the selling notion reflected a cosmopolitan guess at bottom some(prenominal) the parentage and academic spheres regarding the implications of cons umerisms maturement popularity.A lusty dish out of scholars and private instructors surveyed in 1971, for example, believed that the rise in consumerism was a organise disapproval of the inadequacy of the merchandise idea (Barksdale and Darden, 1971). As the presumed retort to the chastening of the market image, then, the consumerist try became the hind end for a revise trade thought which Kotler (1972) proposed as the replacement to the failed market apprehension. As in earlier stages of the market philosophical system evolution, the social trade sentiment was patently constructed upon the ruins of its adjacent predecessor.Since the nearly upstart consumerist scatment in the U. S. served as the throttle valve for todays abstractization and autorying into action of the social merchandising conceit, it would come along central to understand the modern origins of this movement. ORIGINS OF THE advanced(a) CONSUMERISM heading progress to ver bally in 1987, the elevator car Editors of Consumer bring draw one car as perchance the or so modern ( sure as shooting one of the most ambitious) cars ever to come from Detroit (Langworth and Robson, 1987, p. 51). These authors went on to enunciate that these were the kind of cars we should pick out had in the 1970s, and didnt. The car was the Chev sharet Corvair of the 1960s, and its conspicuous absence seizure in the 1970s was the invest result of what some consider to be twain consumerisms detonative postwar creation and also its finest hour. Indeed, the grave accent of the Corvair became the hind end of consumerism as we know it today. date affair historians (e. g. , Halberstam, 1986) are tidal bore to criticize Detroits probable tranquillity and cumbersomeness regarding the 1970s impact of scummy, sparingal automobiles from contrary countries and the oil crisis which precipitated this invasion, this goddam has been clear set and undeserved.In 195 9, universal Motors, acknowledging an alive learn in the marketplace for a small, inexpensive, sporty, and fuel-efficient automobile, designed and marketed a fomite to fill this need. This automobile, the Corvair, was therefore subverter in galore(postnominal) respects, having four-wheeled free-living suspension, a rear-mounted tally six-cylinder engine, the option of turbo-charging (a first), and an give up system design which would be employ on a majority of automobiles for age to come. two the Corvair and its functional, but considerably more uninitiated predecessor, the Volkswagen overhang, were designed, construct, and marketed with the highest regard for the selling beliefionoffering lower-income consumers the probability to let an stintingal, reliable, and fun-todrive automobile. Both cars were strong sellers, and step forwarded to requite a number of preexist unavoidably in the marketplace. In 1960, Consumer Reports praised the Volkswagen for its go od workmanship, and intervention and roadability which were hearty forrard of the U.S. norm. Additionally, near the strap thing that Consumer Reports could find to prescribe near the Corvair was a find about its humble slew note (cf. Abernathy, Clark, and Kantrow, 1983). unfortunately for many a(prenominal) an(prenominal) consumers, Ralph Nader would use these cars as a ballista for his career, and in so doing, would sire synonymic with the consumerism movement. In 1965 he wrote a script em indicator un defend at all whet, in which he criticized crude Motors as being irresponsible, greedy, and nonchalant for the publics base hitty.Nader utilise the Corvair as the hold ins principal(a) example, exploitation an elaborate, scathing, but also comparatively put critique of the Corvair. ascribable to the blackball furtherance which the check generated, the curb dealt a termination transposition to the Corvair, which forthwith began a d declarewa rd(prenominal) gross gross sales voluted toward its net experimental extinction in 1969. enliven by the winner of grievous at every Speed, an equivalently brutish and wrong(p) criticism of the Volkswagen Beetle was compose in 1971 by a cuss and ally of Nader, and was entitle petty(a)On safety artifice (Dodge, 197 1).Since, by the time of this books publication, millions of Volkswagens were on the road and were well-regarded as providing reliable, economical, and long-wearing transportation, the book failed to procure any credibility, and did small-minded distress to Volkswagens sales. What should get under ones skin been unmingled to readers of either book and to consumers in general, but was whitethornhap not apprehended until much later, was that it was physically unimaginable to construct a small delivery car which was as safe as the leviathan Cadillacs, Lincolns, and Chryslers of the analogous period.Had a well-designed car such as the Honda polite (or any other coeval jampack automobile) been introduced into the market in the 1960s, it too would begin certainly been label as unsafe, and coerce off the market. THE SOCIETAL market imagination AND possibleness X The social market notion is more often than not congruous with the treble constituency perplex of organizations (Kimery and Rinehart, 1998), and general notions of the indebtedness or promise of coursees to social and environmental stakeholders.Contrasted to the merchandising archetype or orientation, which posits the form and unsubdivided birth amidst organizational favourableness and reactivity to node take and concerns, the social market impression or deucefold constituency model suggests that success is extremely subordinate upon an organizations regard to all constituencies coincidently (Kimery and Rinehart, 1998). still due to the harsh rivalry mingled with fast consumer take and long-term social and soulfulness take, the simultaneous satis occurrenceion of all of these demands is oft touchy if not out(predicate).Moreover, the focus upon un- verbalise or long-term client needfully and a musical accompaniment discounting of stated consumer desires nourish straightforward overtones of merged or political paternalism and the conjectures of manufacturer or governmental reign, which this perspective necessarily implies. In short, where the selling excogitation is the economic equivalent of the elective process, the social selling concept is antithetic to the tenets of pop equation and more corresponding to economic fascism.In an fluent paper outlining the abstract roots of his social marketing concept, Kotler competent Douglas McGregors managerial hypothesis X / hypothesis Y to illustrate substitute perspectives of customers (Kotler, 1977b). harmonise to McGregor, surmisal X managers military position their employees as being lazy, illiterate, gullible, suspicious, and dis loyal. In melodic phrase, system Y managers grab their employees as informed, intelligent, motivated, unique, and rational (McGregor, 1957, 1985).In his adaptation, Kotler scores the assertion that businesses subscribing to the philosophy bodily inside the social marketing concept put one across assumptions about their customers which are consistent with system Y (as strange to possibleness X). In other words, Kotler believes that the social marketing concept is philosophically accordant with a perspective of the consumer as informed, intelligent, and rational, suggesting the high matte of prescience share by adopters of this concept and alluding to the concepts supposed capableness for consumer em rolement.Although Kotler makes a important constituent in adapting this managerial mannequin to the marketing discipline, he grossly errs in his ascertaination. A far more believable mirror image is that the social marketing concept is solidly built upon surmise X assumptions about consumers on the part of the marketer. accord to Kotler (1977b), social marketers are more attuned to the emptors unspoken require than overexpressed wants, and place an focus upon long-run consumer and social well being. Because of this, the social marketing concept clear forces or compels marketers to make judgments about what is surpass for consumers, and what unavoidably are reasoned (as hostile to those that are bastardly or unwholesome). It is in this way that the societal marketing concept becomes the ultimate referee and underwriter to the possibleness X mentality. The conceptual foundation of the societal marketing concept (as well as of the consumerism movement) rests eavily upon the belief that the individual consumer is unavailing to look out for him/herself, is gullible, ignorant, intimately misled, does not know what is rattling in his/her own trounce interest, and frankincense needs to be protected from almighty and unscrupulou s marketers. In this way, the belief that the role of the marketer is to say what is high hat for society and individuals necessitates the assumption that individuals do not and poopnot know what is vanquish for themselves. Nor is this an exaggeration of the societal marketing concepts goals and assumptions.Bell and Emory (1971, p. 40), proponents of this concept, assert that The typical consumer is at such a single out that he squirtnot underwrite his own effectiveness. wrinkle has the obligation to champion him, and if business fails then the government or other parties mustinessiness act on the consumers behalf. In addition, in lot where the acquireer is loth or otiose to make rational conclusivenesss, Bell and Emory believe that It is the duty of business to promote meet phthisis determine (Bell & Emory, 197 1, p. 40, accent mark added).Yet these are precisely the paternalistic attitudes which characterise the guess X manager harmonise to McGregor. The fa ct that some consumers whitethorn hire to buy a subcompact automobile because they prefer thriftiness over a certain degree of safety, or that some choose to subsist on McDonalds hamburgers, heat up and milkshakes disrespect their unhealthfullness does not imply that these individuals are stupid, or gullible, or that they need to be savant by consumerism or societal marketing techniques, This is in fact the precise point at which the evolution of the marketing concept breaks down.The marketing concept holds that marketers should strive to supply products for every consumer need, provided these needs are not grossly sound to society, and that any decision the customer makes to serve his own comprehend selfinterest is rational (Bauer & Greyser, 1967). It is therefrom impossible to interpret the societal marketing concept as anything but a move retroflex into the period where the selling concept governwhere consumers were ignorant, blind, and intimately anipulated by more i nsightful marketers. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS eyepatch consumerists and other critics of the selling concept regularly and aloud surpass business organizations for employing marketing strategies and campaigns which are ostensibly found upon assumptions of consumer ignorance and irrationality, these same guardians of consumer interest are typically equivalent with those force organizations most forcefully into programs of social tariff and the societal marketing concept.Yet, as note above, the schedule of social office in business is distinctly found upon assumptions of equal (or even greater) degrees of consumer ignorance and irrationality. Disciples of the societal marketing concept appear to be largely preoccupied to the comparatively blotto levels that businesses wipe out been pushed by forces in design with their agenda. (Witness the precedent on McDonalds chocolate cups guard blistery . . . care circumscribe anxious heed baking hot . . . aid ar dent . . . monition red-hot / .. which are unite with a corollary lessening in the temperature of the fluidity itself actions which were necessitated by the notorious multimillion long horse intelligent claim against the order a cause which was applauded by many consumerist groups. ) further, as Levitt historied in 1958, self-conscious devotion to social function may bewilder started as a stringently antisubmarine playing period against conspicuous attacks on large-mouthed corporations and on the lesson ability of the realize system. But defense alone no lengthy explains the motive. The motive for embodied social duty and the whelm push for social office in the followers of sales now arises out of the industrial sectors near-total addiction on social trends and the sentiment of a minority of consumers. Corporations that ca-ca been beaten into submission by flighty lawsuits and that are cowardly to levy consumerist accusations of emotionlessness put up been agonistic to baby to the lowest common denominator of consumer passivity, ignorance, and sloth.As predicted by McGregor, these opening X attitudes and actions confound subsequently bred and strengthen the very passivity, ignorance, and laziness in consumers they were designed to portend and amend. Ironically, the similarities between the selling concept and the societal marketing concept regarding their share assumption of consumer ignorance evict be seen as forming the holy foundation for either societal self-sacrifice or, alternatively, opportunistic exploitation.In many cases, these efforts git be demanding to bring out from one another, and apparent acts of altruism or social business can provide the meliorate camo for exploitation. Because organizations are rapidly nice advised of the forefinger of greenconsumers, for example, there is a pregnant lure to advance this agenda through the marketing program as a regnant device for cultivating customer loyalty and anesthetizing consumer perplexity and vigilance.As Kotler (1994, p. 30) notes, a number of companies mystify achieved famous sales and clams gains through adopting and practicing the societal marketing concept. wizard of the two vivid examples Kotler cites is The trunk fink, started by Anita Roddick in 1976. This organization has experient phenomenal sales ingathering by actively promoting its products as all-natural, environmentally friendly, and non-animal- well-tried, and its business practices as sociallyconcerned.Moreover, Roddick has oftentimes and publicly ridiculed other cosmetics companies, noting that they are run by men who create needs that dont exist (Zinn, 1991). Indeed, The ashes storage became in the 1980s the range of a function that all earth-friendly businesses would sample to emulate. As the forefront of social responsibility, The soundbox sleuth and its crumple became the donee of considerable volumes of validating publ icity, worldwide acclaim, and consumer good go away.Yet recent explorations into The dust Shops products and business practices fork out found elements which fail a crude(prenominal) contrast to the public images and perceptions noted above. Products of the caller take aim been found to be largely petrochemical-based and of sexual relationly poor-quality, and a large harmonise of them confound been tested on animals. In addition, the socially-enlightened business practices of this caller-up oblige been undecided as originative public traffic efforts, and the FTC has nvestigated the firm for two-faced business dealings (Entine, 1993 Buszka, 1997). Clearly, it must needfully be those organizations which are further to view their consumers as ignorant or irrational that can and will most easily exit that notion to note opportunities for exploiting that ignorance and irrationality. It is for this reason that those espousing the societal marketing concept and the soc ial responsibility of business can be seen as the superlative peril to consumer sovereignty and consumer welfare.As victor Acton observed, male monarch corrupts, and commanding power corrupts absolutely. Yet it is a corollary harness that in lessen one individuals power, all others with whom that person deals accept their relative power increased. By forcing consumers into the roles of ignorant, helpless, and reasonless children in need of breastplate and corporal welfare, advocates of the societal marketing concept kick in liberate consumers from both responsibility and power, and have concomitantly do business more powerful. REFERENCES Abernathy, W. Clark, and Kantrow (1983), industrial reincarnation Producing a war-ridden future(a) for America, forward-looking York introductory guards. Bauer, R. and S. Greyser (1967), The negotiation That never Happens, Harvard pipeline reappraisal, (November-December), 186-190. Barksdale, Hiram C. and schnoz Darden (1971), Marketers Attitudes Toward the merchandise archetype, diary of selling, 35 (October), 28-36. Bell, M. and W. Emory (1971), The waffle trade supposition, journal of selling 35, (October), (37-42). line of reasoning calendar week (1969), product line Responds to Consumerism, kinsfolk 6, 95. chore Week (1988), What lead Beech-Nut eat the itinerary to Disgrace, February 2, 124-127. Buszka, Sharlene (1997), A national of Greewashing The consistence Shop, in proceeding of the link of concern and the world-wide necktie of solicitude l5th one-year international Conference, organizational counseling Division, mint 15, human action 1, 199-294. Dodge, Lowell (1972), wastedOn safe The knowing-In Dangers of the Volkswagen, newfangled York Grossman. Drucker, P. (1958), merchandising and economic Development, journal of trade, (January), (252-259). _________(1969), Consumerism The opportunity of trade, plough before the national tie-up of Manufacturers, raw York, April 10, later printed as The disconcert of selling, marketing Communications, August, 1969, 60. Entine, Jon (1994), bust range Is the torso Shop as well as thoroughly to Be authentic? wrinkle Ethics, (September/October). Friedman, Milton (1962), capitalism and Freedom, bread University of sugar Press. Fullerton, Ronald A. (1988), How ultramodern is neo selling? markets phylogenesis and the fable of the fruit Era, diary of merchandise, 52 (January), 108-125.Halberstam, David (1986), The Reckoning, new(a) York Avon Books. Keith, R. (1960), The merchandise Revolution, ledger of merchandise, 24(January), 35-3 8. Klein, T. (1979), coetaneous Problems, marketing scheme, and Futures Research, in abstract and notional Developments in selling AMA Proceedings, 258-263. Kimery, Kathryn M. and Shelley M. Rinehart (1998), Markets and Constituencies An secondary receive of the market Concept, diary of transmission line Research, 43, 117-124. Kotler, P. (1977a), From sales irresistible impulse to marketing Effectiveness, Harvard argumentation brush up (November-December), 67-75. _______(1972), What Consumerism operator for Marketers, Harvard telephone line inspection, (May-June), 48-57. ________(1977b), Considerations In a Theory of humanistic Marketing, on the job(p) Paper, potassium alum work Of focusing, north University. ________(1994), Marketing attention Analysis, Planning, and Control, one-eighth edition, Englewood Cliffs, mod jersey Prentice-Hall, Inc. ________, and S. Levy, (1969), broaden the Concept of Marketing, journal of Marketing, (January), 10-15. Langworth, Richard M. nd whole meal flour Robson (1987), The screw Book of collectible Cars, 1930-1980, newfound York Beekman House. Levitt, T. (1958), The Dangers of brotherly Responsibility, Harvard traffic Review, 36, 5(September-October), 41-50. _______(1960), Marketing Myopia, Harvard Business Review, (July-August). _______(1977), Marketing Whe n Things Change, journal of Marketing, (NovemberDecember), 107-113. McGregor, D. (1957), The homo nerve of Enterprise, anxiety Review (November), 22-28. McGregor, D. (1985), The compassionate brass of Enterprise, naked as a jaybird York McGraw-Hill.McKitterick, J. (1958), What is the Marketing focal point Concept? in The Frontiers of Marketing purpose and Science, stops American Marketing Association, 71-82. Nader, Ralph (1965), precarious At all Speed The Designed In Dangers of the American Automobile, young York Grossman. Samli, A. , K. Palda, and A. Barker (1987), Toward a full-blown Marketing Concept, Sloan Management Review (Winter), 45-5 1. Zinn, Laura (1991), Whales, charitable Rights, rainwater Forests And the resolute sense of smell of Profits, Business Week, July 15, 114-115.